Yes, it seems too much editing has been put into the "after" image from the before one... Yes, but not as extreme as thisNo, looks too over-edited and fake
Surprise me, no.I do, but I work with Guides (aged 10 to 16) and they don't. Girlguiding UK has been campaigning against it for a couple of years now.Natural...it's how I expect a person in a magazine to appear. If the unedited photo was in a magazine I'd wonder why the editor had chosen it.
No not at allYes because no one is as perfect as the enhanced image leads you to believeNo, its to perfect to be natural
No it doesn't surprise me because I know what real people look like, I meet them every day!Yes I realised it went on, see above answer. Nobody real looks like the pictures you see in ads/magazinesIt doesn't look natural at all, see previous answers!
Yes, it seems too much editing has been put into the "after" image from the before one...
ReplyDeleteYes, but not as extreme as this
No, looks too over-edited and fake
Surprise me, no.
ReplyDeleteI do, but I work with Guides (aged 10 to 16) and they don't. Girlguiding UK has been campaigning against it for a couple of years now.
Natural...it's how I expect a person in a magazine to appear. If the unedited photo was in a magazine I'd wonder why the editor had chosen it.
No not at all
ReplyDeleteYes because no one is as perfect as the enhanced image leads you to believe
No, its to perfect to be natural
No it doesn't surprise me because I know what real people look like, I meet them every day!
ReplyDeleteYes I realised it went on, see above answer. Nobody real looks like the pictures you see in ads/magazines
It doesn't look natural at all, see previous answers!